Ads
HomeSports And EntertainmentBobrisky N15m Bribe Case: Reps Probe Unveils New Facts As Whistleblower VeryDarkMan...

Bobrisky N15m Bribe Case: Reps Probe Unveils New Facts As Whistleblower VeryDarkMan Begs, Threatens

Ads

The Joint Committee of the House of Representatives investigating allegations of corruption against some officers of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, and the Nigeria Correctional Service has been told that charges of money laundering dropped in the trial of Idris Okuneye (a.k.a. Bobrisky) were lawful and in compliance with the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, ACJA.

At the hearing, the whistleblower in the midst of the entire episode, VeryDarkMan, apologised to human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, SAN, over bribery allegations against the senior lawyer.

However, House of Reps members shouted: “It’s okay, it’s okay,” after the social media critic Martins Vincent Otse popularly know as VeryDarkMan, vowed to leak the secret about them to the public

Ads

Falana and his musician son Falz had threatened to sue VDM for defamation of character after the social critic shared an audio conversation purportedly between Bobrisky and another man in which it was alleged that Falana was working on helping Bobrisky secure a presidential pardon and had asked for N10 million to complete the job.

VeryDarkMan, who appeared before the House of Representatives Joint Committee on Financial Crimes and Reformatory Institutions on Monday, said he did not believe Falana was involved in the alleged bribery levelled against Bobrisky, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, and the Nigeria Correctional Service.

He then went on to apologise to Femi Falana for the dent he brought upon his name.

In a dramatic session, members of Nigeria’s House of Representatives erupted in shouts of “it’s okay, it’s okay” after social critic, Martins Vincent Otse popularly know as VeryDarkMan, threatened to leak sensitive information about them to the public.

VeryDarkMan expressed his concerns about the state of the nation during the investigative hearing on the bribery case involving crossdresser Bobrisky, claiming, “Nigeria has gone down, and people are now being begged to do the right thing.”

The critic went on to address the judiciary system, asserting that it is “messed up so bad” and that essential functions of governance are no longer operating effectively.

A Prosecutor with EFCC, Bilikisu Bala, told the House of Representatives committee that there were no underhand dealings in the dropping of Bob Risky’s charges and the matter had been legitimately handled.

Bala, head of the EFCC prosecution team that handled the trial of Okuneye pointed out to the Committee that the charges were dropped based on the disclosure of the Special Control Unit against Money Laundering, SCUML, that Okunenye’s firm, Bob Express, was not a Designated Non Financial Institution, Business and Profession, DNFIBP, and could not be prosecuted for flouting provisions of the Money Laundering Prevention & Prohibition Act, 2022.

“We initially raised six count charges bordering on Naira Abuse and Money Laundering against Okuneye based on his confessional statement that his firm, Bob Express, was not registered with SCUML and was not rendering returns to it. Counts 1-4 were on Naira Abuse while counts five and six were on money laundering. Okuneye’s confession that he didn’t register his firm, Bob Express with SCUML and not rendering returns to it informed the money laundering charges initially included in the six count charges. However, when we wrote to SCUML on the status of the firm, the Unit responded that it was not a Designated Non-Financial Institution, Business and Profession, DNFIBP. We cannot lawfully sustain the charges in all sincerity. We, therefore dropped them and relied on the four counts on Naira mutilation to which Okuneye had pleaded guilty”, she said.

The prosecutor dismissed claims of financial inducement in dropping charges maintaining that no such thing happened. “There is simply no basis for that. The Administration of Criminal Justice Act, ACJA, allows amendment of charges. It is a professional practice. It is laughable for anyone to attribute our decision to monetary issues. Why did we write to SCUML if we didn’t want to include the charges? We wrote to be lawfully guided and when the Unit responded that the firm had not breached any law, on what basis should we have retained the money laundering charges?”, she said.

Bala, who appeared before the Committee with top management staff of the EFCC, charged the Committee to critically look into all the issues raised against the EFCC and make public its findings in the interest of justice. Chief of Staff to the EFCC’s Chairman, Commander of the EFCC, CE Michael Nzekwe who stood for the Chairman, Ola Olukoyede restated the seriousness the Commission attached to integrity of its staff. “We viewed the allegation of bribery against our officers seriously. Integrity is one of our core values. This is why we are here to place all the facts involved in the trial of Okuneye in the public domain”, he said.

Okuneye, an ex-convict, had alleged in a viral video that he offered N15,000,000 (Fifteen Million Naira) as a bribe to some unnamed EFCC officers to drop money laundering charges against him.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Ads

Must Read

Ads